<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Board games for participatory research	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ludogogy.professorgame.com/article/board-games-for-participatory-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ludogogy.professorgame.com/article/board-games-for-participatory-research/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=board-games-for-participatory-research</link>
	<description>Games-based learning. Gamification. Playful Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pablo		</title>
		<link>https://ludogogy.professorgame.com/article/board-games-for-participatory-research/#comment-9989</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pablo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 15:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ludogogy.co.uk/?post_type=article&#038;p=2798#comment-9989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ludogogy.professorgame.com/article/board-games-for-participatory-research/#comment-4285&quot;&gt;Sarah Jane Lapp&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Sarah, I just saw your message seven months later. I don´t think farmers played this game by themselves, but I could hypothesize they would change their choices because choices are also affected by audiences, and players. The play within the play is also a metaphor of intersubjectivity, is an antirealistic description of what could be real in a given moment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ludogogy.professorgame.com/article/board-games-for-participatory-research/#comment-4285">Sarah Jane Lapp</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Sarah, I just saw your message seven months later. I don´t think farmers played this game by themselves, but I could hypothesize they would change their choices because choices are also affected by audiences, and players. The play within the play is also a metaphor of intersubjectivity, is an antirealistic description of what could be real in a given moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sarah Jane Lapp		</title>
		<link>https://ludogogy.professorgame.com/article/board-games-for-participatory-research/#comment-4285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Jane Lapp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 10:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ludogogy.co.uk/?post_type=article&#038;p=2798#comment-4285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fascinating! A play within a play...Thinking about Brecht&#039;s erosion of the theatrical 4th wall...I suppose that wall disappears when one is observed playing a game...if no audience does the wall rebuild itself automatically? Did your participant farmers also play the game privately without your presence? And, if so, did their choices change?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating! A play within a play&#8230;Thinking about Brecht&#8217;s erosion of the theatrical 4th wall&#8230;I suppose that wall disappears when one is observed playing a game&#8230;if no audience does the wall rebuild itself automatically? Did your participant farmers also play the game privately without your presence? And, if so, did their choices change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
